Papersby GlyphMulti-User Large Language Model Agents research paper by Stanford University, 2026
Stanford University · Foundation models · Mar 19, 2026 · 9 citations · 28 upvotes · unverified
What it shows
Multi-user large language model agents face challenges in handling conflicting objectives, privacy preservation, and coordination efficiency in multi-principal decision-making scenarios.
By Shu Yang, Shenzhe Zhu, Hao Zhu and 5 more · arXiv 2604.08567 · PDF · Code
UnverifiedHugging Face's summary; not yet checked by hand.
More from Stanford University
All 12Hybrid Reasoning AgentsThis paper introduces an agent architecture that dynamically switches between latent reasoning and text-based interaction to improve performance and inference speed.
Stanford University41 upvotesRead →Thinking Inertia: LLMs Keep Thinking When Told Not ToThis paper shows that explicit controls often fail to stop LLMs from generating internal reasoning traces, a phenomenon the authors call thinking inertia.Stanford University244 upvotesRead →Stateless Language Agents: Scaling Long-Horizon Automated ResearchThis paper introduces a framework where agents remain stateless, allowing a central harness to manage research state and improve long-horizon task efficiency.Stanford University1 citations30 upvotesRead →FAMOS: Feed-Forward 3D Articulation Modeling from Sparse ObservationsFAMOS is a feed-forward model that predicts articulated object motion from sparse point cloud observations.Stanford University40 upvotesRead →AISPA: User-Centric System Prompt Auditing for Large Language Model ApplicationsAISPA is a framework for auditing system prompts in commercial AI products to ensure they are protective of users.Stanford University36 upvotesRead →Recursive Multi-Agent SystemsRecursiveMAS extends recursive scaling principles from single models to multi-agent systems, enabling collaborative reasoning through iterative latent-space computations with improved efficiency and accuracy.Stanford University12 citations235 upvotesRead →Learning to Discover at Test TimeTest-time training enables AI systems to discover optimal solutions for specific scientific problems through continual learning focused on individual challenges rather than generalization.Stanford University118 citations45 upvotesRead →In-the-Flow Agentic System Optimization for Effective Planning and Tool UseAgentFlow, a trainable agentic framework with in-the-flow optimization, enhances reasoning in large language models by coordinating specialized modules and outperforms top baselines across various tasks.Stanford University76 citations113 upvotesRead →
Other foundation models papers
TopicBERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language UnderstandingPre-training a Transformer to fill in masked words, then fine-tuning it, beat task-specific models across language understanding tests.
Google125k citations33 upvotesRead →Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersGPT-3, a 175B-parameter model, does new tasks from a few examples in the prompt, with no fine-tuning.
OpenAI66.4k citations21 upvotesRead →GPT-4 Technical ReportA multimodal model that passes a simulated bar exam with a score around the top 10% of test takers.OpenAI28.4k citations7 upvotesRead →LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language ModelsOpen models from 7B to 65B trained only on public data; the 13B model beats GPT-3 on most benchmarks.
Meta22.6k citations25 upvotesRead →The Llama 3 Herd of ModelsOpen models up to 405B parameters that match leading closed models on many tasks.Meta20.8k citations119 upvotesRead →Qwen3 Technical ReportQwen3, a unified series of large language models, integrates thinking and non-thinking modes, reduces computational resources, and achieves state-of-the-art performance across various tasks and languages.
Alibaba (Qwen)10.1k citations339 upvotesRead →
About this paper
- Venue
- arXiv.org
- Citations
- 9, 0 influential · Semantic Scholar
- Upvotes
- 28 · Hugging Face
- Lab
- Stanford University
Changes
Citations rose from 7 to 9.
Citations rose from 5 to 7.
Citations rose from 3 to 5.
Citations rose from 2 to 3.
A first count of 0 influential citations.
A first count of 2 citations.
Found by the weekly Hugging Face scan; not yet checked by hand.