Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Model research paper by Stanford University, 2023
Stanford University · Alignment and safety · May 29, 2023 · 11,573 citations · 73 upvotes
What it shows
DPO aligns a model to human preferences with a simple classification loss, no reward model or RL loop.
By Rafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell and 3 more · arXiv 2305.18290 · PDF
Summarised by hand from the abstract.
More from Stanford University
All 12Hybrid Reasoning AgentsThis paper introduces an agent architecture that dynamically switches between latent reasoning and text-based interaction to improve performance and inference speed.
Stanford University41 upvotesRead →Thinking Inertia: LLMs Keep Thinking When Told Not ToThis paper shows that explicit controls often fail to stop LLMs from generating internal reasoning traces, a phenomenon the authors call thinking inertia.
Stanford University244 upvotesRead →Stateless Language Agents: Scaling Long-Horizon Automated ResearchThis paper introduces a framework where agents remain stateless, allowing a central harness to manage research state and improve long-horizon task efficiency.
Stanford University1 citations30 upvotesRead →FAMOS: Feed-Forward 3D Articulation Modeling from Sparse ObservationsFAMOS is a feed-forward model that predicts articulated object motion from sparse point cloud observations.
Stanford University40 upvotesRead →AISPA: User-Centric System Prompt Auditing for Large Language Model ApplicationsAISPA is a framework for auditing system prompts in commercial AI products to ensure they are protective of users.
Stanford University36 upvotesRead →Recursive Multi-Agent SystemsRecursiveMAS extends recursive scaling principles from single models to multi-agent systems, enabling collaborative reasoning through iterative latent-space computations with improved efficiency and accuracy.
Stanford University12 citations235 upvotesRead →Multi-User Large Language Model AgentsMulti-user large language model agents face challenges in handling conflicting objectives, privacy preservation, and coordination efficiency in multi-principal decision-making scenarios.
Stanford University9 citations28 upvotesRead →Learning to Discover at Test TimeTest-time training enables AI systems to discover optimal solutions for specific scientific problems through continual learning focused on individual challenges rather than generalization.
Stanford University118 citations45 upvotesRead →
Other alignment and safety papers
TopicTraining language models to follow instructions with human feedbackInstructGPT: fine-tuning on human feedback made a 1.3B model preferred over the 175B GPT-3.
OpenAI25.8k citations26 upvotesRead →Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI FeedbackConstitutional AI trains a harmless assistant from AI feedback guided by a short list of written principles, not human harm labels.
Anthropic3,987 citations4 upvotesRead →Back to Basics: Revisiting REINFORCE Style Optimization for Learning from Human Feedback in LLMsReinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) benefits from simpler REINFORCE-style optimization methods over computationally expensive PPO or "RL-free" methods, enhancing performance and reducing cost in large language models.
Cohere804 citations18 upvotesRead →Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety TrainingModels trained with a hidden backdoor kept their deceptive behaviour through standard safety training.
Anthropic657 citations30 upvotesRead →Alignment faking in large language modelsClaude 3 Opus sometimes went along with a training goal it disagreed with, to avoid being changed, without being told to.
Anthropic393 citations10 upvotesRead →Why Language Models HallucinateModels hallucinate because training and benchmarks reward confident guessing over saying they do not know.
OpenAI391 citations200 upvotesRead →
About this paper
- Venue
- Neural Information Processing Systems
- Citations
- 11,573, 2,389 influential · Semantic Scholar
- Upvotes
- 73 · Hugging Face
- Lab
- Stanford University
Changes
Hugging Face upvotes rose from 71 to 73.
Influential citations rose from 2,369 to 2,389.
Citations rose from 11,437 to 11,573.
Influential citations rose from 2,281 to 2,369.
Citations rose from 11,001 to 11,437.
Influential citations rose from 2,248 to 2,281.
Citations rose from 10,860 to 11,001.
Influential citations rose from 2,207 to 2,248.
Citations rose from 10,647 to 10,860.
Influential citations rose from 2,203 to 2,207.
Citations rose from 10,615 to 10,647.
Citations rose from 10,608 to 10,615.
Added to the list.